Immigration Review

Ep. 115 - Precedential Decisions from 7/4/2022 - 7/10/2022 (adverse credibility; inconsistencies; deficient NTA; in absentia motion to reopen; CIMT & drug trafficking; reinstatement, INA § 212(a)(9)(C), and right to counsel; CAT & clear error)

July 11, 2022
Immigration Review
Ep. 115 - Precedential Decisions from 7/4/2022 - 7/10/2022 (adverse credibility; inconsistencies; deficient NTA; in absentia motion to reopen; CIMT & drug trafficking; reinstatement, INA § 212(a)(9)(C), and right to counsel; CAT & clear error)
Show Notes Chapter Markers

Barseghyan v. Garland, No. 16-72849 (9th Cir. July 8, 2022)

  • credibility; asylum; inconsistency; Alam; past persecution; totality of circumstances; opportunity to explain; plausibility; Armenia

 

Gudiel-Villatoro v. Garland, No. 20-61050 (5th Cir. July 8, 2022)

  • deficient NTA; in absentia motion to reopen; Rodriguez; failure to update address; failure to provide address; Spagnol-Bastos

 

Daye v. U.S. Att'y Gen., No. 20-14340 (11th Cir. July 6, 2022)

  • CIMT; drug trafficking; Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-248.01; Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-256; intent to distribute; conspiracy; mens rea; conspiracy; morally reprehensible 

 

Rivera Vega v. Garland, No. 19-71750 (9th Cir. July 8, 2022)

  •  reinstatement with adjustment of status application pending before USCIS; INA § 212(a)(9)(C); IIRIRA; retroactivity; right to counsel; reasonable fear review

 

Brito v. Garland, No. 21-1278 (7th Cir. July 7, 2022)

  • clear error review; standard of review; speculation; DHS appeal; temporary BIA members; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(a)(4); Familia Michoacan cartel; CAT; Mexico





*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!

Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.
Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.

Docketwise
"Modern immigration software & case management"


Want to become a patron?


CONTACT INFORMATION
Email: kgregg@kktplaw.com
Facebook: @immigrationreview
Instagram: @immigrationreview
Twitter: @immreview


DISCLAIMER:
Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.

MUSIC CREDITS:
"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 

Support the show
Barseghyan v. Garland (9th Cir. July 8, 2022)
Gudiel-Villatoro v. Garland (5th Cir. July 8, 2022)
Daye v. U.S. Att'y Gen. (11th Cir. July 6, 2022)
Rivera Vega v. Garland (9th Cir. July 8, 2022)
Brito v. Garland (7th Cir. July 7, 2022)